2005 Saturn L300 |
Saturn was a good attempt to beat the Asians at their own game; a decent product at a decent price…plus, it introduced the far-out concept that dealerships could actually be a less than terrifying and frustrating experience. Imagine. GM did and they were.
The cars themselves were primarily aimed at folks that were
not enthusiasts like you and me. One feature was the expected plastic body
panels. Many automotive writers complained of the gaping shutlines, which were
designed intentionally to compensate for contraction and expansion caused by changes
in ambient temperature. This always mystified me; did they not realize who
these cars were for and when was the last time you overheard a non-enthusiast
discussing that issue? Instead, it was brilliant and that’s why you can find so
many used Saturns on the market that don’t exhibit body rust and major body
damage. They could take a Walmart lickin’ and keep on tickin’.
The basis for the Saturn L-Series wagon, the Opel Vectra B. |
So what exactly were these medium-sized L-Series wagons?
Well, believe it or not, what folks were really buying was a less stylish Opel/Vauxhall/Holden/Chevrolet
Vectra, also known as the GM era Saab 900, 9-3 and 9-5. General Motors changed
the name of the wagon (and sedan) seemingly from year to year, with LW2, LW300
and L300 being the badges for our spotlighted V6-powered wagons. For the
purpose of this article, I’ll just refer to it as the LW300.
Shoulda, woulda, coulda...we should have gotten the Opel Vectra C. |
Why not the 4-cylinder engine models, you may ask? Saturn is
typically associated with rather agricultural four bangers, but it makes no
sense in the L-Series; take advantage of the loss of value and get a better,
smoother, just as reliable if not more so, more powerful engine that suits the
car far better. The 2.2 liter had only 140 hp to move 3100 pounds, as opposed
to 182 in the 3.0 sixer, which weighed in at just under 3300 pounds. Like the
Hyundai Elantra Touring, you’re going to want the bigger motor paired with the
automatic, especially if you plan on commuting in it. Mileage dropped to 18/26
in comparison to 21/31; we’re still enjoying relatively cheap gas (for how
long is anybody’s guess…), so treat yourself. Doing so also avoids the infamous timing chain issues associated with the 2.2.
Wise REVolutionaries will be a bit concerned for my short
term memory loss at this point and gently bring the fact that Saturn began
offering the L-Series wagon that I write of in 2000. I’ve avoided the first couple
of years because GM, like many car companies, released the car before working
out all of the bugs and early models have a higher risk of troublesome issues.
Get a 2003 and you’ll not only get a mildly face lifted version but also a more
reliable automobile. I’d like to say that this is the American way, but it’s
true of many makers; cars are complicated beasts.
Unfortunately, GM in all its wisdom decided to base the L300
on the old-tech Opel Vectra B, not the updated C, which was released in 2002.
That’s too bad because the C was a far more stylish and modern design and there
was even a turbocharged V6 in the toy box that pumped out 248 hp. That would
have been nice, but it probably would have boosted the price too high and
scared off the lemming-like buyers. Still, the updated interior would have
surely made the vehicle an even more appealing sales proposition.
And that’s one of a couple of my complaints about the LW300;
the interiors were not as thoroughly depressing as past models from the
company, but they weren’t works of art either. I remember driving a friends SW
wagon and it made me so sad that I couldn’t wait to get out of the car. That
and the horrendous NVH turned me off to Saturns entirely until I drove an
L-Series, which was much better but still not class-competitive. Part of the
problem in the LW300 was that the engine, while quite good to drive, felt like
it was directly bolted to the frame; I could feel every buzz and shift. Not
good in a Euro-wagon. They got the NVH a bit more under control, but there was
still too much of it on the highway, too.
Opel Vectra interior. |
Saturn L300 interior. |
The all-mighty measurement of rear seat leg room is an
unexceptional 35.4 inches. By comparison, the 2004 9-5 had 36.6; a toss-up.
Maximum cargo in the Swede is 73 cubic feet, 79 in the Saturn! The Ford Taurus
wagon at the time was even better with 81 cubic feet, but the L-wagon was a
better car in just about every conceivable comparison to the slightly more
costly 155 hp, 3500+ pound Taurus.
Personally, I’m not dismayed by the exterior styling. Could
it be better? You bet. But it’s clean, purposeful and not ostentatious. The contemporary
Saabs had a rear hatch design that limited functionality; not so with the
LW300. It reminds me of the XV10 Camry wagon, which is a very good thing in my
book.
Parts are readily available, there are plenty of these on
the market and don’t forget those rust and dent resistance plastic body panels.
What you’re getting is a far better Saab wagon without the pain of owning a
Saab, even if you’re giving up the joy of badge snobbery.
So what about current values? The expected bargain basement,
clearance sale KBB is just what you’d expect; wonderful. How about a top of the
line 2005 L300 for just $2400 private party? Skip the leather interior, by the
way. You’d think it would class up the joint, but it doesn’t. They’re actually
less comfortable and your chances of finding an LW300 with a leather-swathed
driver’s seat in good condition are pretty slim. That’s an amazing deal and we’re
talking pocket change/coffee money here. Taking a quick look online, while
there are far more sedans offered, there are plenty of wagons in that price
range to pick from. Only cars with extremely low mileage having higher asking
prices but why would you care about that? This is a buy it, use it till its
dead and then get rid of it kind of car.
Okay, so far there isn’t much that is American about this
car whatsoever. But this article begins with the words “American pride” but
this is a European Opel wagon with the same motor in as Saabs at the time. “What
gives, K2?” you say. Well, you’ll be relieved to know the L-Series was built the
lovely city (it isn’t) of Wilmington, Delaware. When L-Series was cancelled,
the factory began pumping out Sky/Solstice/Opel GT/Daewoo G2X sports cars until
they shut the doors in 2009. This last bit is interesting historically because
it was the final straw for mass automobile production in NorEast America. A sad
day, to say the least, and the sadness doesn’t end there; Fisker was supposed
to begin building cars there. But we all know how that story ends.
The LW300 is a used station wagon buyer’s dream and you’ll
end up with a car that’s pretty easy to work on, has an interesting European
lineage and you’ll pay practically nothing for it while enjoying utility that
rivals most SUVs and crossovers.
So K2, what do you think of the new UK Top Gear? Please don't throw anything sharp at me.
ReplyDeleteSo far, so bad! See my other blog for details.
ReplyDeleteOnce again, you've found a clearance sale bargain of a car. I remember driving a sedan version and thinking how much I liked how it handled. A fantastic winter beater or teenager/college kid vehicle.
ReplyDeleteI've been thinking about this Saturn. Interesting article, K2. I only know it with a Vauxhall badge on it and here's my memories of that car: overall, the Vectra was a comfortable but pretty dull vehicle. The one exception was the turbo GSL version. That was pretty entertaining to drive but I'm sure there aren't many around any longer.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I preferred the Omega, which was really just a Holden Commodore. Over there, you got the gen 2 as the Catera. I had a Lotus Omega TT for a while and really liked that car. It was a real ripsnorter and I took many an M5 by surprise.
You should check out the wagon version of the Omega.
BTW I agree with what you wrote about Slop Gear.
ReplyDeleteB- Thanks for the suggestion. Will do. I didn't know you had a LoMega. That's awesome! I want to hear more about that car - email sent!!!
ReplyDelete