Is there a car in this picture? Where is it? Where's the Waldo-Volvo! |
If your kid is on their way to educating their liver, also
referred as college, they need a nice, safe car that they can haul all of the
stuff they need for their dorm room in. Or maybe you’d wisely like to take advantage
of steep depreciation on a compact wagon that you can haul your small to
medium-sized dogs around in; something that’s safe, has a bit of luxury, isn’t
ostentatious in any way and oriented towards safety.
I’ve got a car for you; the first-generation V40. Exactly
like the S40 sedan, it offers utility that many sport-utes can’t while
maintaining a lower center of gravity and the accompanying more predictable
handling, which is quite good for a FWD, just over 3000 pound vehicle.
In 1995, Volvo started selling the S40 and V40 compact sedan
and wagon overseas. It took them five years to bring it to the States. The
target audience was Generation X, who apparently didn’t need a lot of cargo
space but did like the $25K base MSRP, which undercut just about every other
European wagon available on the market here (more on that at a later date).
Famed Volvo hotrod shop TWR set up the suspension, but don’t
get too excited; these are nowhere near as balanced as the contemporary BMW
3-series wagon (see recent articles on the subject). While the ride and
handling definitely have a European flavor, you won’t be tearing up the apexs.
Power from the turbocharged 1.9 four-cylinder, which is a revolution of what
you could get in the old 960 minus a cylinder or two, was nothing to write home
about, with 160 hp and 170 torques. Still, if you’re in the city bopping
around, the 0-60 in the eight and a half range isn’t terrible.
The interior is pretty much the same as the larger contemporary Volvo S60 sedan and V70 wagon. If you’re used to sitting in a car from the Swedish “I go!” company, then you’ll feel right at home. In fact, the entire driving experience is very familiar, which is weird because the first gen S40 and V40 are based on the Mitsubishi Carisma and Proton Waja platform. Both of those cars are considered large family cars overseas and you could even buy a crossover with that platform, the Mitsubishi Space Star. All of them were built at the same plant in the Netherlands and none were huge sellers. While all of the models combined for decent sales numbers worldwide (most likely in the 1-2 million sold range), they never sold in Toyota numbers. The best sales year for the V40 in the States was
You could get a 4-speed automatic or…an automatic. Only one
transmission was ever offered here, the well known, sturdy and trouble-free Toyota-owned,
Japanese-made, Aisin AW50-42LE, which was offered elsewhere in the Volvo line
too. In 2001, the transmission was upgraded to the Aisin five-speed AW55-5X,
another transmission that was used in an awesome array of cars from a wide
variety of makers. I think it’s worth it to try to focus on a V40 with this
transmission because it’s slightly more comfortable on the freeway and maybe a
tiny bit more efficient.
Despite some shortcomings, these are quite well made
vehicles, with a very reasonable long range ownership prognosis. Maintaining
one is pretty easy and parts are fairly easily obtained. There are performance
upgrades available, but unlike the turbo 5-cylinder Volvos, it’s a bit more
work for less gain. If you want to boost power over 200 hp, you’re looking at
reflashing the ECU and better breathing. That’s no surprise, but what is that
there aren’t a lot of sources to obtain upgrades from. As always, online forums
contain all of the information leads you’ll need. But the V40 isn’t really the
vehicle you want if you’re looking for more performance anyway. It’s just best
to leave this one stock and enjoy it for what it is. MPG is rated at 19/27ish.
The exterior design is, well, boring. It’s a smooth two-box
design that will excite nobody. But that’s a good thing if you’re trying to fly
under the radar. Buy a silver one and you’ll be practically invisible.
Back to the minimal cargo room; how small is it? Well, that
depends on your expectations and how you’re using it. If you need to haul long,
thin objects, the folding all of the seats down (for 68.1 cubic feet),
including the front passenger, will allow you to haul an amazing bit of junk.
But the 33.5 feet of cargo space with all of the seats in place is still less
than the contemporary Subaru Outback wagon, which had 34.3; instead of a
backpack, it’s more of a fanny-pack slung behind you.
Surprisingly, the rear bumper is quite high. As I’ve written
many times before, that’s a real concern for me and might even prevent me from
buying a V40. The V50 is a bit better, which I’d plump for instead. Rear leg
room in the V40 is an absolutely pathetic 32.7 inches. That’s awful; forget
carrying passengers back there. What were they thinking; a Ford Focus SVT hatchback
has nearly half a foot more rear leg room!
There’s a real deal to be had on one of these bite-sized
Swedish meatballs; KBB private party with a leather interior values range from
$2 for a 2000 all the way up to $3.5K for a loaded 2004 LSE. Winter beater and bargain shopper
alert! There are a lot of these on the market, so you’ll have your pick of the
litter.
The first generation S40 sedan and V40 wagon were replaced
by the superior in every measure P1/C1-based S40 and mystifyingly renamed V50.
Nice post about a nearly-forgotten car. I thought that these were built on the Ford Mondeo platform (Ford owned Volvo at the time). Was that a different Volvo, or is it just another indication that my memory is failing?
ReplyDeleteAs far as I recall, you're not far off...the Mondeo platform was under the Jag X-Type wagon. But I don't think it made it under any V40s, which as I mentioned became the V50, based on the P1/C1 platform (like your Focus, for example).
ReplyDelete[img]http://i.imgur.com/iIZ48UB.jpg?1[/img]
Let's just say your memory is...selective. Ha ha! Like I remember...wait, what were we talking about?
I forgot to mention an interesting feature of the V40; there was a seatbelt in the cargo area. But it wasn't for passengers, it was for securing items in the trunk area. Here's a link detailing it from Volvo itself, but I think that feature didn't make it the States. Probably for legal reasons. I could be wrong and if anybody has proof, please let me know.
I'd just like to register the same darn complaint I've had for years and years and years...why do/did carmakers put the a/c controls ABOVE the stereo? If there's one device in the car that you're going to really LOOK at, it the stereo. Stupid.
ReplyDeleteIt's worth noting (alert alert, all you car stereo thieves) that Volvo stereos have to be the easiest radios to remove of all time. They don't even need tools! Just press in the tabs on the lower left and right and out pop two handles that let you just yank it right out. Super cool design if you ever need to swap the stereo or have it serviced.